Bel
Canto/Can Belto
To Belt Or Not To Belt:
Is That Still the Question?
Although there are many concerns,
interests, questions and mysteries concerning singing technique for
theatrical singers, there are more misconceptions, old wives' tales and
prejudices concerning belting than any other subject. For this reason, I
have chosen belting as the topic for the first Singers on Stage
newsletter feature article. I hope this article will clear up any
misunderstandings you may have about belt singing, and that you will
write or e-mail to me any questions or comments you may have. It is a
very controversial subject, so I am looking forward to your response.
If we were all to become
ethnomusicologists and take a trip around the world listening to
aboriginal people sing, what we would find is that when trying to
communicate with the voice out of doors over any distance (beyond a
fairly close range), people use their calling voice. Whether summoning
their children, bringing workers in for meals, communicating with war or
hunting parties, or chanting or singing for ceremonial occasions, the
calling voice has the acoustical properties and the amplitude to be
heard outside of an enclosed resonating space. The calling voice, as
opposed to shouting or screaming, is the basic vocal technique of the
belt singing voice and is a natural, harmless, and very useful way to
use the voice.
We are all born with the capacity to
belt. It is prejudice and ignorance, usually coming from the academic
world, that has given belting (and those who teach it) a bad name.
In western civilization, the history of singing reached a fork in the
road with the advent of the great cathedrals in Europe. Within the walls
or the cathedrals, the music for religious services became increasingly
sophisticated, and the singers more skillful. The choirs of mens' and
boys' voices were no longer calling outdoors, warning of danger,
locating food or finding each other, but creating the sounds of angels
resonating within the walls of the cathedral. Angelic, indoor singing
required a new singing technique, and created a whole new vocal
aesthetic which developed into what we now call classical singing. In
the theatre world we call it legitimate singing, or the
"legit" voice. Meanwhile, on the streets and in the
marketplaces outside the walls of the cathedral, the common people used
their outdoor calling voice to sell their food and wares.
Just as the cloistered world of the
Catholic Church became the center of learning and the forma arts, the
new indoor style of art singing became institutionalized. Over the
centuries as the centers of learning shifted to the universities,
classical singing moved with it, and the separation between classical
singing and popular singing styles grew ever wider. As the oral and
written traditions of classical singing grew and became standardized,
popular singing styles remained a folk tradition with no intellectual
underpinning. I know of only one university in the western world where
belting technique has been institutionalized and accepted as a valid
course of study: Brigham Young University.
So how can you learn to belt? Whereas
popular culture is a course of study at many institutions of higher
learning, belt singing is simply not offered. (There are scattered
university voice faculties who teach belting, but it is usually done
after hours outside the university environment.) There are no
standardized tests that singing teachers have to take to get a license
to teach, so finding a good singing teacher is chancy-even more so with
belting. Teachers who teach belting have to learn the technique on their
own. You can't get a degree in teaching popular singing techniques.
What follows is some information that should be helpful in finding your
belt voice. You can learn only so much from written instructions. In the
end there is no substitute for a good teacher. Good luck!
-Bill Reed